Tag: Atiku

  • Group presents PDP presidential forms to Atiku

    Group presents PDP presidential forms to Atiku

    In readiness for the PDP party primaries, Members of All Atiku Support Groups officially presented PDP Presidential Expression of Interest and Nomination forms purchased by the group for His Excellency Atiku Abubakar (GCON) at the campaign headquarters Abuja today 31st August, 2018.

    This is not only in support of Alhaji Atiku Abubakar interest in contesting for the seat of President, but the belief by these support groups that he is the best option to put forward by the party in the next presidential elections.

    The presentation
    The presentation to HE, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar
    The presentation
    Acknowledgement by HE, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar
    The presentation
    Appreciation by HE, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar
  • 2019: Atiku PDP’s only hope – Showunmi

    2019: Atiku PDP’s only hope – Showunmi

    The PDP’s only chance of defeating the APC’s presidential candidate in next year’s presidential race is by fielding the versatile and most popular candidate- former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

     

    Segun Showunmi, the Director Media and Publicity of Atiku Campaign Organization, in this interview with Patrick Andrew, reveals why none of the other aspirants can match Atiku.

     

    The siege of the National Assembly complex by heavily armed DSS men and the face-off between the PDP and the APC arising there from, must be a setback for democracy?

     

    We must be very vigilant about what we allow, what can be acceptable, is tolerable and what is condemned in its entirety in a democracy.  Investigation should take place by the appropriate authority on how such brigand, lawlessness, embarrassingly difficult to explain position came about.  Suffice to say in a democracy, moderate conduct, independence of other organs, respect for the rule of law and separation of powers are what people look out for to say how your democracy is faring. What happened around the National Assembly complex is sad, unfortunate regrettable, unacceptable and condemned in its entirety.  Every explanation that the managers and handlers of the Federal Government have in this matter only makes them incapable, unworthy, dictatorial and immature in handling democracy.

     

    Without taking sides, how do you imagine other nations of the world would react to the commentary of every blessed day they wake up to read about Nigeria in newspapers and internet?

     

    They read about all manner of things that suggest that we are almost turning our country into a Banana Republic.  The rule of engagement on who controls what, gives what instructions, has what right to give what instructions, are clearly spelt out in the schedule of duty of the Federal Government; the operational manual of government.  It would be difficult to accept that the top echelon of the Directorate of the State Security can be manipulated and moved about without some permission.

     

    The kind of gears that you saw them wear, the military fatigue that they put on and how timely at which they moved, the coordination of the vehicles and the instrument of coercion and the guns they were holding all of these suggests that somebody must be responsible.

     

    The APC seems to suggest that the incident (siege) was staged managed by the senate president?

     

    We must be careful when we listen to rumors or react to rumors.  Rumors are just as they are called rumors: unsubstantiated, unverified, unproven and sometimes out right falsehood that shifts out in this new information management opportunity that social media and the internet avail us.  What you would expect a decent and responsible government, President Muhammadu Buhari to do is to investigate and determine what has happened.  But you see, when a set of activities take place that is not good for democracy and it is ignored like what you saw in Benue State and what was happening around Ekiti State after the loss of the election, what you are going get, is that people get emboldened to continue in the direction that leads nowhere honorably. And had those who had the responsibility of managing the agencies of security been up and alive to their responsibility they would have sent a clear signal that that level of meddlesomeness and unprofessional conduct is not acceptable in a democracy.  So, it is a regrettable, unfortunate needless set of activities that our country has been bedeviled with.  And that is one of the reasons why we say to Nigerians that our democracy has a lot to learn from a democratic leader.

     

    Atiku is a democratic leader who knows how to build consensus, listens to people, whose approach to problems is not the barrel, the stick and the guns, allows democracy to thrive through solution based discussions to resolve knotty issues.

     

    The relationship between the Legislature and the Executive is always a topsy-turvy one all over the world.  You see it in America, in Europe and sometimes when you are watching the Prime Minister of Britain address her colleagues in parliament and you see the level shouting you understand that truly in a democracy everybody must be given opportunity to have their way and separation of powers must be respected.

     

    When you see how much time, effort and persuasion it takes the most democratic leader in the world- the American President- to get his way even with his own congress, you know that the principle of managing executive power in a democracy fits better with someone that has democratic credentials.
     

    And I dare say that Nigerians would quickly yield the leadership of the country to my Principal the former Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, His Excellency the Wazirin Adamawa, Atiku Abubakar to be president now.  Then all persons would learn and see that it is possible to be president, be democratic and still wield power in a way that institutions become bigger and better managed than converting it into a cult followership of just one man and his tendencies.

     
    With the entry into the Presidential race of the Governors of Gombe and Sokoto States respectively, do you feel threatened?

     
    A democratic party or a democratic process imagines that once it is time for people to present themselves in an aspiration for any office, the presidency none-the-less, people that are qualified and not exempted by law, it is within their right to push, market, and present themselves.  What we will be looking for is to see that the processes are free, fair, transparent and credible and once you are presented to the processes that fit those minimum requirements then we would say, “may the best man win.”

     
    What do we need to do to signpost who the best man is?

     
    We will have to look at the situation in the nation at that point in time. The person that will lead must look in totality at where the life of that nation is. Based on the situation it is determined which man is best prepared to handle the nation.

     
    Now give me the opportunity to say where Nigeria is today.  Every Nigerian knows that right now our country is divided for some needless reasons: brothers are no longer smiling with their brothers, farmers and herders that have cooperated for thousands of years are no longer able to see themselves as friends and relatives or as neighbors or even contemporaries.

     
    If you are a farmer and you hate a herdsman, what about asking yourself, is there no symbiotic relationship with manure and yourself? If you are a herdsman and kill a farmer are you not worried that you are at the base of the pyramid where all of you are trying to egg out a living and that you are just killing yourselves for nothing? People are divided across tribes. When you see a nation that is divided you need to ask which of the aspirants has the capability to unite them from previous earned-experience.  I make bold to say that Atiku is.  He is at home with the South West, he has businesses located there, he is at home in South East by marriage and some of his children are half Igbo, South-South through long-time relationships that has never created any problem, and he is very much at peace with the middle Belt as one of the highest non-indigene title holder in Benue State.

     
    He is Fulani by tribe so nobody can come and wipe up any sentiment about and against Fulani. He is royalty being the Wazirin of Adamawa – Prime Minister of a large community, and connects with traditional communities.

     
    He is a big consummate businessman that the business communities are at home with him, an employer of labor so that those in the business of creating employment are able to connect with him.  That is Atiku for you.

     
    Why is Atiku most qualified?

     
    Look at the past, Atiku is someone with vision and great ideas, who effects or establishes them.  Let’s look at some of them: the Pension Fund, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Privatization, Bureau of Public Procurement and the latter was interesting.  Atiku had found out that there was a report by the World Bank sometime in 1999 that procurement in Nigeria was the most expensive in the world.

     
    It means that if a Nigerian government agency wanted to buy biro or paper they found out that the price the agency was paying for the biro was more expensive than any other procurement in the world.  That was dangerous, so Atiku came up with the idea of Bureau of Public Procurement as a policy to say that public procurement must fit into a particular template and it cannot be above it just to be sure that from managerial framework Nigeria’s procurement does not become the most expensive in the world.

     
    If the PDP must go into the 2019 presidential contest it must go into the race with a strong brand. I believe that Atiku is that person.

  • 2019: PDP, ADC, R-APC, 36 other parties sign grand alliance MOU to oust APC

    2019: PDP, ADC, R-APC, 36 other parties sign grand alliance MOU to oust APC

    By Dirisu Yakubu

    ABUJA-The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), African Democratic Congress (ADC), the Reformed All Progressives Congress (R-APC) and 36 other political parties Monday signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in a grand alliance to form a government of national unity in 2019. The sole agenda according to the MOU, is to produce a joint Presidential candidate capable of winning the election and enthrone a new government at the expiration of President Muhammadu Buhari’s tenure in 2019. Former Acting National Secretary of the PDP, Senator Ben Obi in his opening remarks said the various parties chose to come together to salvage the nations and put to end all semblance of nepotism and tribalism.

    According to him, the President Buhari administration has left Nigerians more divided than they were in 2019. “We are here to begin a process that will lead to the formation of a government of national unity. We are here to put to an end the nepotism and corruption that the APC government has been known for in the past three years. “They promised to tackle corruption, revamp the economy and address security challenges and restructure the nation but as soon as they were elected, they denied making such promises. ” We are here to put an end to to dictatorial tendencies and this is a war between light and darkness and I can assure you that light would prevail,” said Senator Obi. Also speaking, R-APC national chairman, Buba Galadima noted that the MOU will send shivers down the spine of the ruling party, adding that since he led a splinter group out of the ruling party, the R-APC has been receiving messages of solidarity from across the world. Buhari will lose 2019 election-Galadima For Galadima, President Buhari is fated to lose the 2019 election, adding that if the President knew what awaited him, it would have been better for him not to go into electoral contest at all. “With what I know, I can tell you that President Buhari will not only this election, he will lose his deposits. Let us not forget that the man we will be facing is a military general. We are ready, prepared to take on this fight despite their intimidations and threats. “I know him but if I was his adviser, I will tell him not to contest,” Galadima said even as he reminded parties to the alliance that the APC has set aside huge sums of money to buy them over in the months leading to the general polls.

    Representatives of the ADC and former governor of Osun State, Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola on his part described the coalition as “an assignment from God,” even as he urged the parties to be committed to the letters and spirit of the MOU. He said: “We are committed to restructuring of this nation and we must respect the spirit and letters of this understanding.”

    When Nigerians voted in 2015, they thought the APC vehicle will take them to the promised land. But three years after, the APC has failed and failed tragically too.” Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation and Minister of Finance, Chief Olu False lamented what he termed the “gross incompetence” of the APC-led government and tasked all parties to the alliance to team up in supporting not only a sole Presidential aspirants but sole governorship candidates, Senatorial candidates as well as House of Representatives candidates across all states of the federation. “All our votes must go to the Presidential candidate and to the governorship, senatorial and House of Representatives in every state of the federation. “It is not sufficient to produce the President alone because if we have a President who does not have majority of seats in parliament, there will be challenge as to what the President would be able to do,” he noted. Parties that signed the MOU were the Action Alliance (AA), Alliance for Democracy (AD), Africa Democratic Party (ADC), Action Democratic Party (ADP), All Grand Alliance Party (AGAP), Action Peoples Party (APP), Advanced Congress of Democrats (ACD), Better Nigeria Progressive Party, Democratic Alternative (DA), Democratic Peoples Party (DPC), Grand Democratic Party of Nigeria (GDPN), Green Party of Nigeria (GPN), KOWA Party, Labour Party (LP), Mass Action Joint Alliance (MAJA), Masses Movement of Nigeria (MMN). Others included the National Conscience Party (NCP), New Generation Party (NGP), National Unity Party (NUP), Nigeria Intervention Movement (NIM), Peoples Alliance for National Development and Liberty (PANDEL), Peoples Progressive Party (PPP), People for Democratic Change (PDC), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Providence People’s Congress (PPC), Reformed All Progressive Congress (RAPC), Restoration Party of Nigeria (RPN), Social Democratic Party (SDP), Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), All Grassroots Alliance (AGA), National Interest Party (NIP), Nigeria Democratic Congress Party (NDCP), Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA), and Young Democratic Party (YDP) among others. Baraje, Melaye return One of the highlights of the wells attended event was the formal return to the PDP of its former Acting National Chairman, Alhaji Abubakar Kawu Baraje and the lawmaker representing Kogi East, Senator Dino Melaye. While thanking the PDP for accepting him back in its fold, Baraje said a prodigal son regardless of his sins, would always be received with joy upon repentance from his sins. “We went astray but we are back now. If a child burns one of his fingers, he quickly retreat the others. I will like to thank you for accepting to take us back,” he said. Like Baraje, Melaye said he had the option to flow with the crowd but chose to return to PDP to remain politically consisted, saying come 2019, “President Buhari will fail because he is entitled to failure. Dignitaries at the event included former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, ex-Senate President, David Mark, the governors of Gombe and Akwa Ibom States, Ibrahim Dankwambo and Udoh Emmanuel respectively. Others were Senator Liyel Imoke, Gbenga Daniel, Ibrahim Mantu, Tom Ikimi, Zainab Maina, Ike Ekweremadu and Chief Bode George.

  • Going to the USA is not a constitutional criterion to contest for President

    Going to the USA is not a constitutional criterion to contest for President

    We have heard and continue to hear about presidential hopeful Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Waziri Adamawa going to the United States of America (USA) before he can contest or be voted for. I am alarmed that this went viral even with the knowledge that this is not a criterion to contest for the seat of President, nowhere in the Nigeria Constitution is it stated.
     

    Some say he is on a list, such list has never been produced nor submitted for public viewing, neither has a document or instrument charging him to a USA court for corruption been produced nor is there a warrant for his arrest from any agency here and abroad. He has not been invited by the Economic Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), and he never been indicted for any crime.
     

    Bad news travels fast and far, and the opposition has seen it fit to use the grapevine to taint his image, knowing fully well that many Nigerians go by what they hear and many do not verify information nor ask questions before they believe.
     

    Like any other Nigerian who wishes to travel out of Nigeria to a foreign country on a Nigerian Passport, a visa is required, he must submit his passport to the embassy in question and they may or not approve a visa for him. Alhaji Atiku Abubakar has traveled on many occasions to several countries including America as an ordinary citizen and as Vice President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
     

    What has changed? There is a new sheriff in town called Donald Trump who dislike immigrants though a product of an immigrant family. A white supremacist, who came up with radical policies concerning immigration that even Americans disagree with. Nigeria is obviously a target, some have disgraced Nigeria by participating in fraudulent activities, and of course President Buhari who went about telling the world that Nigerians are corrupt forgetting that he too is a Nigerian. Trump has on more one occasion insulted the African continent, the black race and specifically Nigeria. In the first part of Trump being in office, he placed Nigeria on a list; Nigerians were harassed and disgraced at US entry points, some sent back even with visas or green cards. This harassment and molestation of Nigerians is still going on.
     

    So let’s get the record straight, void of any evidence to prove any wrongdoing by the Waziri Adamawa, this matter should be laid to rest and real politics played. May the best man win.

     

     

    Omololu Ojehomon

  • Rebuild Nigeria International Forum (RNIF) supports Atiku on restructuring

    Rebuild Nigeria International Forum (RNIF) supports Atiku on restructuring

    The Rebuild Nigeria Initiative Forum, a non-government and patriotic citizens’ support-driven organisation has thrown its full weight behind former Vice-President and Presidential aspirant Atiku Abubakar’s model for restructuring Nigeria.

     

    In a statement by the forum’s Vice-President, Otunba Wale Fasan, the organisation recalled that Atiku was the first Nigerian to suggest restructuring as a mode for reuniting a multi-tribal Nigeria that had hitherto been plagued by misunderstandings and strife amongst the various nationalities comprising it.

     

    The statement came as a followup to the group’s show of solidarity to the Waziri of Adamawa’s presidential ambition during his electioneering campaign held recently at Oshogbo, the Osun state capital, home state of the hopeful’s wife, Chief (Mrs) Titi Atiku Abubakar.

     

    Fasan, during an interview with newsmen at the occasion said that the group was gladdened by the Waziri Adamawa’s support for restructuring and urged Nigerians to be referred to several publications in Nigeria’s major newspapers, dating as far back as July 13, 2001, in which Atiku had championed the cause for the inevitability of restructuring the entity Nigeria.

     

    “Waziri Atiku Abubakar is the one person that has the moral authority to say restructuring is possible because he has engineered it before. He is not saying I can do it, he is saying I have done it”, Fasan said.

     

    “Many Nigerians may have forgotten that there was once a dilemma in Nigeria called the onshore/ offshore dichotomy. In 1984, Major General Mohammadu Buhari (rtd) reduced the amount of derivation funds paid to oil producing states to a paltry 1.5 % by military fiat and left the offshore oil revenues to the federal government. It was not until the 1994-95 Constitutional Conference that patriots led by Shehu Musa Yar’Adua and Atiku Abubakar mobilized other members of the conference to come up with a unique solution to the onshore/ offshore dichotomy. Their solution provided a formula for the administration of the derivation principle and contained three very significant embodiments”, he added.

     

    According to him, the first embodiment was that allocation to derivation should stand at a minimum of 13 percent. The second was that the dichotomy between onshore and offshore exploration should not be taken into account for the purpose of revenue allocation. The third was that the boundaries of littoral states were clearly defined as extending to Nigeria’s exclusive economic zone which at the time stood at 200 nautical miles.

     

    “When the 1999 Constitution refused to take this unique solution into consideration (being that it was forced on the nation by the military), the onshore/offshore dichotomy raised its ugly head and threatened to tank the then nascent Obasanjo administration and the nation with it. It was precisely Atiku Abubakar who used the network he built at the 1994-95 conference to persuade both President Obasanjo and Niger Delta Governors including Obong Victor Attah and Dr. Peter Odili, (who were his colleagues at the 1994-95 constitutional conference) to reach a political solution and just like that, and by an Executive Order, President Olusegun Obasanjo, with the intervention of Atiku Abubakar, used a political solution to solve a problem caused by the constitution”, Fasan declared.

     

    Earlier in his speech at the Osogbo Freedom Park venue of the event, Waziri Atiku Abubakar urged Nigerians to unite against all forms of division currently threatening the peace of the country and take back their country from the voyage of destruction!

     

    Ojomo, Olusegun Adebambo Esq. (Communications’ Specialist)

    Credit: firstnigerianews
    Com

  • 2019 IN PERSPECTIVE; THE BUHARI REGIME AND CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS

    2019 IN PERSPECTIVE; THE BUHARI REGIME AND CERTAIN CHARACTERISTICS

    Let me start by stating that political parties in Nigeria have no perceptible ideological divide. I expressed my views on this in a previous piece on platform mobility. The political parties exist in fulfillment of constitutional requirement as the only organ that can sponsor candidates for elections in Nigeria. They are barely able to control their elected officers and depend on government and a few moguls to fund their activities. As a consequence, political successes are predicated on the capacity and character of individual actors in Nigeria.

     

    Let me make certain positions clear before going further:

     

    1.  I have nothing against the age of president Buhari or that of former vice-president Atiku.

     

    I am not sure there is a problem with the age of any legally qualified person as long as such a person is mentally and physically fit enough to hold office.

     

    2.  I do not hold any of them in contempt. I supported President Buhari’s government until recent events in the policy cycle.

     

    President Buhari was a former military head of State and once presided over Nigeria’s oil sector. With the benefit of such background, he had more than enough exposure to rule Nigeria from day one upon his election in 2015. In addition, he had the benefit of running for office three times before he won on the fourth attempt if I am correct. In other words, he had nearly 16 years to prepare to be president. Against this background, much was expected from him in the area of policy making, implementation and monitoring. Many also expected that he would have been comfortably abreast with the economic and socio-political dynamics of our country. From the evidence on ground, he doesn’t appear to have measured up, even half way, with the broad expectations of the Nigerian people who voted massively for him. I will deal with a few areas briefly, due to need to promote brevity for want of time.

     

    SECURITY & WELFARE

     

    Section 14 (1) (b) of the Constitution provides that our country shall be a state founded on democracy and social justice with the security and welfare of the people being the primary purpose of government. Can we say that this obligation is being met under this regime? I do not think so. This regime was voted in as a corrective one, not a story telling one. The public was aware of the problem with Nigeria before mandating this regime to do the needful. This is the basis upon which a logical assessment can be done.

     

    It is conceded that some meaningful work has been done in the war against boko haram but the events of the group lately question the efficacy of the methodology adopted in this fight. With hundreds continuing to die innocently in the hands of this group, this campaign cannot be regarded as durably successful. An approach review is a desideratum.

     

    Whatever the gains of government in the Boko haram efforts, they lost it with Fulani herdsmen. Buhari is the best placed person to deal with this menace. Apart from his office, he is fulani himself. Yet he is unable to summon the courage to call his brethren to order. He cannot even set up a national commission to find lasting solution to this threat to Peace nation wide. How can a group of people move around with so much illegal weapon and kill men and women on the slightest provocation? Why should a group of people kill freely nation wide without remorse or fear of the law? The herdsmen obstinacy is an impetus of the Buhari regime. It was a scanty and localized threat before then. This is a major dent to the image of the regime.

     

    I need not tell anyone about the spirally geometric increase in kidnapping, armed robbery, human trafficking and ritualism nation wide. These crimes have always been around. The dimension that they have assumed smacks of official complicity by law enforcement agents. Coming from a regime like this, it is a let down. Imagine the number of lives that have been lost to perpetrators of this crime unchallenged. These are products if institutional failure that no one else but Buhari should take the blame for it.

     

    Today, many live in fear and suspicion. Life is no longer sacred. It is daily illegally terminated. Just like a discarded piece of toilet paper. Most of the victims are from the masses who are ironically the center of Buhari’s rise to power. There seem to be no end to this crises as it is closely connected to the social order. With more than three million dislocated from the Labour market and more Libyan refugees coming back home, we would need a miracle not to witness a further increase in this direction. With the type of police we still have, we may need serious fasting to avert a complete breakdown of law and order. Nothing has been done about the police. We all know this. When Buhari came, the police pretended for a few weeks and on seeing that he was not as capable as they thought, they are back in full swing. They are three times worse than they were before Buhari. Ask the public about this.

     

    ECONOMY

    YES, we are in a recession. It may be true that previous regimes did not do certain things correctly but there was a promise to do it right by Buhari. Did he get it right? He took 6 months to appoint about average ministers, prohibited the operation of domicilliary accounts and that pushed the dollar underground in a free world order. What did he expect? He got a bloody nose. Of course his poor communication skill pushed oil production down in the Niger-Delta due to increased Militant activities, until regional leaders intervened. While this was on, government lost revenue and recession crept in.

     

    It is correct that oil prices dropped and there was additional loss of revenue, but the choice of his cabinet did not help matters. A regime, whose leader so much chastised his predecessor in office ended up retaining many arrow heads of that regime and from the same political party that President Buhari discredited. It was clear evidence of a huge deficit in talent hunting and a demonstration of the act of double speaking.

     

    The perception held by many international rating agencies of the economic policies of President Buhari, is one of policy epilepsy and therefore hardly would recommend our economy to foreign investors. From a promise of creating three million jobs or so, this government has caused the loss of about the same figure of jobs due to lack of more creative ways of growing the economy. For example, limiting most categories of official cars to INNOSON cars alone would have created a boom in the auto industry and encouraged more people to invest there. Instead, billions of Naira are wasted on land cruisers, Lexus and prado jeeps, etc, for all sorts of public officers even during a recession. I will leave this alone for now.

     

    INDISCIPLINE

     

    It is not difficult to understand why there is so much policy failure by this regime. Just figure out the following:

     

    1.  SSS stops Buhari’s nominnee for EFCC chair in the senate and nothing happens.

     

    2.  Minister of Petroleum fights NNPC’s GMD in public over insubordination and non compliance with due process.

     

    3.  HOS accuses HON. AG of complicity in reinstatement of Maina. The same AG meets Maina in Dubai at a time when he was on the wanted list of criminals.

     

    4.  IGP maintains that he has the right to engage in romance with female police officers.

     

    5.  Opulent living style by many government officers during a recession that has led to the death of many and dislocation of many more.

    I would reserve my comments on the anti-corruption campaign, if indeed there is one for another write up. In my part two of this series, I will deal with Atiku and his ATIKULATION.

     

    Dr. West-Idahosa

  • IS PLATFORM MOBILITY THE REASON FOR POOR GOVERNANCE?

    IS PLATFORM MOBILITY THE REASON FOR POOR GOVERNANCE?

    By Dr. West-Idahosa

     

    Nigeria’s independence was not the product of any tough or ideological struggle. It came as a result of Britain’s political decision to let a number of countries off the hook following the popular crave for independence at that time. Nigeria happened to be one of them. There were no strong ideologies like the type that existed in some former colonies that got their political emancipation through ” blood and iron”.

    The early set of political elites probably founded their political parties on some sort of development theories. NPC was anchored on a catch-up- the south development prototype. Action Group was predicated on populist welfarism and NCNC on nationalism. Even then, the advent of decamping gained prominence in the then western region, when Action Group is believed to have instigated indigenes of the region to leave other parties for ethnic reasons. Nationalists like Azikiwe who had won elections in the west were left in bewilderment.

    Subsequent generations of politicians diminished in character and preparedness for real governance. The decline of the political environment led to the militarization of governance with the Babaginda era signposting the final fall of official morality. The post Babangida era politicians came in with an inherent settlement culture that commercialized the electorate at a time when everyone was expectant of a share of the national cake. The public became less interested in the quality of governance as long as their votes were procured.

    The political parties became zonked in patrimonialism and side effects like godfatherism, impunity, imposition, purchase of party tickets etc became characteristic of the partisan political system. Those who were lucky to occupy the positions of power and influence schemed to exclude rivals from the centre of control. Dominant elites squeezed life out of challenging elites.

    The survival struggles promoted platform mobility which enabled politicians to search for platforms of convenience. It must be remembered that the 4th Republic which has been the longest, started with the likes of Bola Ige preparing the manifesto of PDP, APP and AD in the same spirit but different semantics. There was no real difference. Ige and his co-travelers left PDP on the excuse that there were unwanted elements in their midst. They formed APP. They again left for the same reason and formed AD.

    The seed of platform mobility which they sowed germinated into a home grown acceptable political behavior. Innumerable number of politicians have benefited from this over the years. It can no longer be regarded as an aberration or can it be credited for the failure of any elected public officer in office. This practice existed before 1999 and has remained thereafter. There are very few real political operatives in our country who may not have changed their platforms. The likely reason for that may be that they are members of the clique that manipulate the party’s control apparatus. Once they lose it, they too may be on the move.

    The public is aware of this behavior and seem to have endorsed it over the years by continually voting for politicians without any regard for his platform history. This is clearly a ratification of such practice, which by evolution is now part of the political culture of our country.

    Can this be the reason why some public officers let the electorate down after being elected to office? Certainly not. Public officers fail for for many reasons. Some have no capacity to cope with the large demands from the office they occupy. Others are too neck deep in their plan to enrich themselves and nothing else matters to them than their plot to steal the nation dry. A category of elected officials are slaves to nepotism. They think corruption is all about stealing money and turn government appointments and contracts into a theater of mediocrity. Of course, they end up failing.

    Most elected executives end up larger than the political parties that sponsored them. They fail to consult with the parties or even glance at the manifestos of such parties. They maintain an olympian aloofness from their political parties. What a pity! The parties may have created their own irrelevance in the political system that we operate. When party leaders and delegates are paid to fly their parties’ tickets and sometimes by all manner of people, what really do they expect from such commercial contractual mandate? Can you eat your political cake and have same? I am sure you cannot.

    Platform mobility is not the problem with Nigeria’s political system. It is a mere symptom of other underlining political problems. We must look deeply into the causes of such mobility in order to proffer pragmatic solutions to the real problems with our political system in the hope that we can achieve our dream of an egalitarian society.